To the editor:
As voters across the 6th District prepare to cast their ballots in the upcoming Democratic primary, it is vital to look past campaign rhetoric and evaluate candidates based on actual legal experience, administrative execution and proven dedication to the Commonwealth. While challenger Diann Baylis has framed her campaign around important ideals, her platform and background do not match the extensive, battle-tested qualifications of incumbent Councilor Terrence Kennedy.
Terrence Kennedy brings more than 40 years of practicing criminal defense and trial experience to the Governor’s Council, having successfully litigated thousands of cases. He started his legal career as an assistant district attorney in Norfolk and Middlesex counties; Kennedy possesses an intimate, working familiarity with the entire judicial system, the judges on the bench, and the practitioners who appear before them.
In contrast, Baylis highlights her background as an immigration and family law attorney and volunteer. While immigration advocacy is a noble calling, its singular focus is irrelevant to the comprehensive scope of the Governor’s Council. The council is responsible for vetting and confirming judges across all levels of Massachusetts courts—including criminal, civil, appellate, and supreme courts, as well as many other executive appointments. Reviewing judicial nominees requires a seasoned legal background that spans criminal prosecution, defense, and complex civil litigation, rather than a single practice area.
Furthermore, Kennedy’s tenure is defined by concrete actions protecting civil rights and ensuring balanced representation on the bench. When the late Supreme Judicial Court Justice Barbara Lenk faced intense nationwide backlash for being a member of the LGBTQ community, Kennedy was a vocal, steadfast supporter of her historic nomination. Similarly, when the SJC lost its only African American member following the George Floyd protests, Kennedy successfully held the executive branch accountable to ensure that vacancy was filled by a qualified African American jurist. Baylis speaks vaguely about open-mindedness, but these are principles Kennedy has actively defended and executed under intense political pressure over the last 16 years.
The Governor’s Council is not a place for on-the-job training. Vetting, questioning and confirming judicial nominees requires delicate negotiation, institutional trust, and a deep understanding of executive-judicial dynamics. Baylis’s proposals to “better vet and educate” judges read more as aspirational talking points than a realistic methodology.
Beyond her legal background, Baylis has established a pattern as something of a perennial candidate — having previously considered a candidacy for the U.S. Congress, but not ultimately running. She appears to be an office seeker in search of any available job rather than a dedicated public servant rooted in the community. Ultimately, Baylis offers nothing other than opposition to a successful, dedicated public servant who has delivered steady, reliable leadership on the Governor’s Council.
Rather than satisfying an office-seeker’s personal ambitions, we should vote for Terrence Kennedy in the primary on September 1st. He has earned our support and will maintain stability, integrity and experienced leadership on the Governor’s Council.
Yours truly,
Thomas F. Connolly
Gerald Road
